Idaho Gas Drilling: New Activity Raises Community Concerns


Bridge Energy is the first company to drill in Idaho during the current wave of gas exploration. It is concentrating its efforts in Payette County.

This is high desert land covered in corn, wheat and barley that rolls along as far as the eye can see. This is also where seven of Bridge Energy’s wells are ready to produce once a pipeline and processing facility come on line.

Access the entire story with a map, photos, and audio/video files: Idaho Gas Drilling: New Activity Raises Community Concerns

(By Aaron Kunz, Boise State Public Radio/Idaho Public Television)

(Link provided by Pat Rathmann)

Comment Period Extension for Port of Lewiston Expansion


With the possibility that Imperial Oil could ship megaloads up either or both highways coursing north from the Port of Lewiston, our public resource interests would best be served by constraining the capacity of the port to accept and store oil company modules at its facilities.  After all, it was the hearty welcome to the port by the Mega-ho governor and congressional delegation that foisted this looming industrial corridor hell upon us.  The good news is that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), who must consider any dock extension permit requested by the port due to its forays into public waters, has extended the public comment period another thirty days until August 22, 2011, perhaps due to our collective insistence.  So if you have not commented yet (perhaps due to WIRT’s late notice: Sorry!) or if you commented only on the overarching megaload situation encouraging port expansion (as detailed in Fighting Goliath’s forwarded talking points: Thanks!), you now have an (additional) opportunity to dissect and denounce the technical intricacies of the port’s expansion plan.  WIRT hopes to provide more information about these items later.  However, the bad news is that the Corps did not (yet!) offer public hearings addressing this port proposal, as many of us requested, and that the Port now also proposes laying foot-deep gravel on ten acres “to allow for additional storage area for equipment and miscellaneous products delivered to the port” (likely more megaloads).  Please see the brief public notice/permit application/project proposal, Port of Lewiston Expansion Permit Application, and WIRT’s submitted Port of Lewiston Permit Application Comments.  Send your comments about Application NWW-2010-213-Wpr (note different number) to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers at PortofLewiston-PN@usace.army.mil.

(From WIRT Newsletter)

Port of Lewiston Expansion Plan Comments due Friday, July 22


The Port of Lewiston has applied to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for a permit to expand their dock facilities into the Clearwater River.  The Port is proposing this expansion explicitly to increase its capacity to accommodate larger equipment and oversize cargo, likely more oil-processing megaloads that haulers could transport on U.S. Highway 12 and/or U.S. Highway 95 and onward to the interstate system and the Alberta tar sands.  As a tax-payer funded project that could receive support amid ubiquitous budget crises, the expansion may also encourage later silt dredging in front of Port terminals and/or raising of the Lewiston dikes to offset possible flooding aided by ongoing silt accumulations.  Further discharge of dredged and fill materials into the river could adversely impact water quality.  This potential Port enhancement could also simultaneously buttress the economic viability of the four lower Snake River dams while further jeopardizing the recovery and restoration of wild salmonid and other fish populations in the Clearwater Basin.  All of these consequent conditions could precipitate myriad negative socioeconomic and ecological effects in our region.

Unless the Corps grants an extension, the 30-day public comment period for the Port’s expansion plan expires on Friday, July 22.  Please ask for an extension of the comment deadline that currently deters many regional residents who travel during the summer months from submitting comments.  Demand a series of public hearings in Lewiston and the affected highway corridor cities, during which public officials could share information and accept input.  Also tell Corps decision makers that the current environmental assessment for the Port’s plan is inadequate and that an environmental impact statement should be prepared to study the cumulative impacts of this project.  See the Port of Lewiston Expansion Permit Application and consider utilizing some or all of the preceding and following talking points provided by our allies All Against the Haul, Fighting Goliath, and Friends of the Clearwater.  Send your emailed concerns to the Army Corps of Engineers at PortofLewiston-PN@usace.army.mil or your mailed written comments to:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Idaho Falls Regulatory Field Office

900 N. Skyline Drive, Suite A

Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402-1700 Continue reading

Hearing Officer Recommends OK for Megaloads


More than 200 megaloads of Korean-made oil equipment bound for Canada should be given the go-ahead to roll across northern Idaho’s scenic U.S. Highway 12, an Idaho state hearing officer ruled Monday.

Retired state Judge Duff McKee, in a 63-page ruling, discounted every protest against the megaloads from a group of residents and business owners along the twisting, two-lane highway, from safety to business interruptions to environmental harm.  His ruling is a recommendation to the Idaho Transportation Department; there’s still an opportunity for motions for reconsideration, a process that could take weeks more.

“I conclude there was no error in procedure on the part of ITD in the issuance of the permit in this case, or any other basis to interfere with the executive determinations of the department in issuing the permits in this case,” McKee wrote in his ruling.

Imperial Oil/ExxonMobil wants to ship more than 200 giant loads of oil field equipment across the Idaho highway, en route from the Port of Lewiston to the Alberta oil sands.  The loads are so large that they’ll block both lanes of the two-lane road, creating a rolling roadblock.

Read more: Hearing Officer Recommends OK for Megaloads

(By Betsy Russell, The Spokesman-Review)

Oil on Lubicon Land: A Photo Essay


Melina Laboucan-Massimo, a member of the Lubicon Cree First Nation and a climate and energy campaigner with Greenpeace, describes the impacts of oil and gas developments and the recent oil spill in the traditional territory of the Lubicon Cree in northern Alberta.

Stop the Megaloads Now!


“Monstrous machines over wild and scenic Idaho and Montana highways could destroy the wilderness and roads. … To block Exxon in this deal is to start breaking chains.  This Exxon tar sands obscenity is a prime example of all that is tyrannical and evil in our sick, dead system.  Join us, fight the power, if not for the land, for the water, for the world you live in, then for yourself, because this is the first battle in the fight to free us all…”

(By Paul Edward, ClassWarFilms)

Winona LaDuke Speaking about the Alberta Tar Sands


Winona LaDuke, noted Native American activist and author, speaking recently at the Native American Center at Portland State University.  Winona spoke for about half an hour about the Alberta tar sands and also about the large oil extraction equipment being shipped from South Korea through Portland and along narrow highways though Idaho and Montana.  (www.honorearth.org/stop-tar-sands)

Monitoring Megaload Madness on Highway 12


Big Oil Turns Idaho Scenic Byway into Industrial Trucking Corridor

This video shows a ConocoPhillips megaload as it travels Highway 12 at night, along the Wild and Scenic Middle Fork of the Clearwater River in north central Idaho.  The Port of Lewiston, State of Idaho, ConocoPhillips, and Imperial Oil/ExxonMobil are working to convert Idaho’s stretch of U.S. Highway 12 from a beautiful Scenic Byway and All American Road to an industrial truck route for the transport of gargantuan loads of heavy equipment.  The oversize loads block the entire highway as they travel past the rural communities of Orofino, Kamiah, and Kooskia, plus other small towns along the route in Idaho and across Montana to Canadian tar sands operations.

Concerned citizens have been monitoring the activities of these massive shipments and have documented the chaotic nature of the Idaho Transportation Department’s traffic management practices and the risks to public safety, travel delays, and infrastructure damage created by these transports.

Natural Gas from Fracking Could Be ‘Dirtier’ than Coal, Cornell Professors Find


Extracting natural gas from the Marcellus Shale could do more to aggravate global warming than mining coal, according to a Cornell study published in the May issue of Climatic Change Letters (105:5).

While natural gas has been touted as a clean-burning fuel that produces less carbon dioxide than coal, ecologist Robert Howarth warns that we should be more concerned about methane leaking into the atmosphere during hydraulic fracturing.

Read more: Natural Gas from Fracking Could Be ‘Dirtier’ than Coal, Cornell Professors Find

(By Stacey Shackford, Cornell Chronicle Online)

ITD Officials Defend Palouse Plan


Critics question process for selection of U.S. 95 route through prairie.

The Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) is defending its controversial plan to build a four-lane highway next to one of the most endangered prairie ecosystems in North America, touting the route’s increased safety.

District 2 engineer Jim Carpenter said the new road will cut in half the number of accidents on U.S. Highway 95 south of Moscow.

“We did follow a thorough process through this,” he said.  “The department’s goal is to be sensitive to the environmentally sensitive areas.”

ITD has drawn criticism for its plan to re-route a curvy, two-lane stretch of Highway 95 over Paradise Ridge, a popular landmark south of Moscow.

Read more: ITD Officials Defend Palouse Plan

(By Benjamin Shors, staff writer, The Spokesman-Review, November 8, 2002)